學術論壇
您必須為協會會員或專科醫師才可擁有發表文章及討論之權限。
| 發表人 | 討論主題 | 發表時間 | 討論數 |
| 張瓈文 | 單孔達文西機械手臂輔助經膀胱攝護腺切除手術之手術技巧及預後 | 2025/8/21 下午 12:18:42 | 0 |
| 原 文 | 題 目 | Single-port Transvesical Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes |
| 作 者 | Roxana Ramos, Ethan Ferguson, Mahmoud Abou Zeinab, Nicolas Soputro, Jaya S. Chavali, Adriana M. Pedraza, Zeyad Schwen, Carter Mikesell, Jihad Kaouk | |
| 出 處 | Eur Urol. 2024 May;85(5):445-456 | |
| 出版日期 | May 2024 | |
| 評 論 |
良性攝護腺增生(BPH)是影響老年男性生活品質的重要疾病。對於體積大於80ml以上的患者,若藥物無效,傳統會建議進行開放性或經腹腔的攝護腺切除術(simple prostatectomy)。然而,這些手術方式侵入性較高,復原時間長,併發症風險也相對較高。近年來,機器手臂輔助的微創手術已被廣泛應用。尤其是達文西單孔系統(da Vinci SP system)可經單一切口完成複雜手術。本研究探討經膀胱途徑的單孔機器手臂輔助攝護腺切除術(single-port transvesical robot-assisted simple prostatectomy, SP-TV-RASP)之安全性、技術細節與臨床效果。 此為為回溯性單中心研究,納入28位攝護腺體積大、排尿困難且經藥物治療無效的男性患者,皆由同一名經驗豐富的泌尿科醫師操作SP系統。手術經恥骨上膀胱穿刺切口進入,於膀胱內環狀剝離增生腺體,保留攝護腺包膜,最後止血處理並修補膀胱頸與黏膜。所有手術皆於達文西SP平台下完成,無需另加輔助切口。 根據研究結果,進行單孔經膀胱機器手臂輔助攝護腺切除手術(SP-TV-RASP)的病患,其平均年齡為 68.8 歲,大多為高齡男性。接受手術的患者平均攝護腺體積達 162.5ml。手術本身平均耗時約 184分鐘,術後平均住院時間為 5 天,導尿管則平均保留約3天。無術後短期併發症發生。 功能改善方面顯著,術後患者術前的國際攝護腺症狀評分(IPSS)大幅改善;此外,最大尿流速(Qmax)、殘餘尿量(PVR)亦明顯下降,且病患生活品質也顯著進步。 本研究顯示,單孔機器手臂輔助經膀胱攝護腺切除術(SP-TV-RASP)是一項安全、有效,且具美觀與微創優勢的手術方式,特別適用於中大型攝護腺體積患者。其手術經由恥骨上進入膀胱內操作,無需進入腹膜腔,可有效降低腸道干擾與腹腔沾黏的風險;此路徑也避免與盆腔其他器官產生黏連,因此特別適合曾接受腹腔手術族群。此外,單一切口設計美觀且術後疼痛感較低,有助於病患快速恢復並提升術後生活品質。 |
|
| abstract |
Background: Surgical management of large prostatic adenomas can be performed via open, endoscopic, or robotic approaches. A low-profile single-port (SP) robot was built to work in confined areas (ie, the bladder) and regionalize surgery. Objective: To describe the novel SP transvesical (TV) robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) and report clinical outcomes. Design, setting, and participants: SP TV RASP cases were performed in an academic hospital by two surgeons from 2019 to 2023. A total of 117 cases were performed, and data from patients with at least 12 mo of follow-up were analyzed. The inclusion criterion was severe obstructive urinary symptoms or catheter-dependent urinary retention due to large prostates with volume >80 ml. Surgical procedure: The procedure consisted of two main steps through a single 3-cm suprapubic incision: first, enucleation of the adenoma, and second, a 360° bladder mucosal flap reconstruction. No drains or continuous bladder irrigation was used routinely. Measurements: Intraoperative parameters, pre- and postoperative uroflowmetry, and 1-yr clinical outcomes were assessed. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data. Results and limitations: All procedures were completed successfully without additional ports or conversions. The median console time and estimated blood loss were 107 min and 100 ml, respectively. Transfusion rate was 0%. Intraoperative complications included two suspected air emboli attributed to high insufflation pressures. There were no major postoperative complications. In total, 95.8% were discharged within the first 24 h, with a median length of stay and pain score of 5 h and 3/10, respectively. There was persistent improvement in the median International Prostate Symptom Score and flow rate after 1 yr. The median Sexual Score Inventory for Men score was 20 at 12 mo. Our study is limited by its retrospective nature and cohort size. Conclusions: SP TV RASP is a feasible alternative for the management of severe benign prostatic hyperplasia that promotes fast recovery and demonstrates 1-yr improvement in urinary function. |
|
| 回覆發表 | 回覆討論主題內容 | 最後發表 |
| 目前尚無任何相關的回覆資料 | ||


